[Chart] Splitting gtk stuff into a separate package
Tim Docker
tim at dockerz.net
Fri Jan 6 23:09:08 GMT 2012
I'm fine with this. The reason I hadn't done it previously is that we have a dependency on cairo, and in my experience, gtk gets installed along with cairo. If some people find the gtk dependency a burden, then lets factor it out.
chart-gtk sounds like a reasonable name for the package. Whilst it would be a separate item on hackage, I think we should keep it in the same darks repos for now.
Tim
PS: I enjoyed your post "On stream processing, and a new release of time plot coming" and the subsequent discussions on haskell cafe. When I have a change I will study your incremental processing code in a bit more detail.
On 07/01/2012, at 7:18 AM, Ben Gamari wrote:
> The Google Groups list is no longer being used as we now have a real
> list from projects.haskell.org. Forwarding to this list.
>
> For what it's worth, this sounds like a fine idea to me.
>
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 18:57:42 +0400, Eugene Kirpichov <ekirpichov at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think it's worth cutting gtk-related stuff (all that depends on
>> -fgtk) into a separate package for the following reasons:
>>
>> * building gtk bindings is horrendously slow, up to an hour or two
>> with profiling, and it gets repeated if you mess something up
>> (happened to me more than once). It's very good to eliminate this from
>> a clean install of Chart.
>>
>> * on some platforms (eg the default amazon ec2 Ubuntu image) gtk
>> carries a ton of dependencies which are also sometimes difficult to
>> install and easy to mess up (I messed up my ec2 env so much that I
>> surrendered)
>>
>> * usage of Chart without -fgtk is very common, so it's a completely
>> orthogonal part and can be safely split out.
>>
>> I have actually completed the split on my machine, but I'll be able to
>> send the patch only tomorrow. In the meantime, please let me know
>> what you think:
>>
>> * is this a good idea?
>> * if yes, how would you like to name the gtk package? Is Chart-gtk fine?
>> * do we need a new darcs repo for that package?
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chart mailing list
> Chart at projects.haskell.org
> http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chart
More information about the Chart
mailing list