[Haddock] Re-creation of haddock repo

[David Waern]

2011/6/8 Simon Marlow <marlowsd at gmail.com>:
> I think you need a separate development branch.  The branches would
> therefore be:
>
>  - stable: the one we ship with GHC releases
>
>  - development: works with the latest GHC release, but has new
>    Haddock development (fixes from stable merge in here)
>
>  - master: works with GHC HEAD, merges from development
>
> Then I think everyone is happy.  Haddock development happens on the
> development branch and doesn't need GHC HEAD, we can keep the master branch
> working with GHC HEAD, and we merge from development into master from time
> to time.

I like this proposal. This is actually more like what Ian has proposed
before. We'll have to do a bit of merging but it's probably worth it
if we can continue to develop with a stable GHC version. They way I
understand it we'd also be tying Haddock major releases to the GHC
release cycle, but that's OK with me.

I'll put a git repository on http://code.haskell.org/haddock with
these branches, and backup the darcs repository somewhere, and you'll
decide when you want to switch?

David