iteratee comparisons vs. enumerator package

[Conrad Parker]

I haven't tried it because I need bytestring and seeking support which it
does not provide. However I like some of its design, such as Yield which is
a neater way of handling unprocessed elements than my convStateStream
function. It may be the case that the CPS style of iteratee 0.4 is even
neater.

I hope we can work together towards a common API and infrastructure rather
than make marginal and incompatible improvements just for benchmarking.

cheers,

Conrad.

On Aug 21, 2010 12:38 AM, "John Lato" <jwlato at gmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

Has anyone tried out John Millikin's recently-announced enumerator package?
 I've long felt that there's a place for a light-weight iteratee framework
so I'm glad to see him take it up.  Based on my very limited tests so far
(essentially testing wc -l), enumerator doesn't seem quite as efficient as
iteratee-HEAD, but it is the 0.1 release.

John

_______________________________________________
Iteratee mailing list
Iteratee at projects.haskell.org
http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/iteratee
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://projects.haskell.org/pipermail/iteratee/attachments/20100821/f0fa164b/attachment.htm